Custer's Revenge[img width=145 align=right]http://www.rfgeneration.com/images/games/U-005/bf/U-005-S-01210-A.jpg[/img]
Week: 2005.07.17 - 2005.07.23
Game: Custer's Revenge
Console: Atari 2600
Year: 1982
RFG ID #: U-005-S-01210-A
Publisher: Mystique
Developer: Mystique
Genre: Adult
Sub-Genre: Adult Action Game
Players: 1-2 Players
Game page address: http://www.rfgeneration.c...l?ID=U-005-S-01210-A&Screenshot page address: http://www.rfgeneration.c...hot.pl?ID=U-005-S-01210-AAnd they thought the sex mini-game in
San Andreas was bad....
Custer's Revenge is, among collectors, known as probably the most nefarious game of all time. Sure, from
Death Race to
Night Trap to
Mortal Kombat to
Grand Theft Auto III, video games have spawned controvesy, but none deserved condemnation more than this 2600 monstrosity.
Though admittedly somewhat rare,
Custer's Revenge has increased greatly in monetary value over the past few years. Why would anyone want such trash? Perhaps there is a draw to "complete" a collection, or perhaps people just like to own a little piece of history, especially when it was and still is controversial.
Some misinformed parents and crazed politicians still regard video games solely as childrens' toys. However, there is no denying that the average gamer is well over the age of 18, a legal adult in the United States and most other countries of the world. Do some games go too far, though? Can a game damage the average person's perception of the video game industry (with no benefit to a game's experience) at the expense of damnation of future games intended for mature audiences?